http://bigblog.dukechronicle.com/wp-content/themes/press

12% of restaurant employees come to work sick

23 Feb 2011, Posted by Chris Taylor in News, 0 Comments


Do you ever worry when you see a restaurant employee coughing while on duty? Since their job revolves around food, you would hope that any sick restaurant worker would take the day off.

A recent study conducted by Duke University Hospital, however, shows that 12% of all restaurant workers have come to work twice in the past year while suffering from diarrhea or vomiting. Considering that past studies found the percentage to be 5%, this news is particularly disturbing.

For those who frequent restaurants, these results may be alarming—that is, after all, one out of eight food service employees. Generally, one restaurant keeps more than eight employees on duty during peak hours.

Restaurants serving more than 300 meals on busy days were even more likely to have workers come in when sick, according to the study.

“It may be if you’re working in a busy place your manager is less likely to send you home, or you may feel bad to leave your coworker stranded on a busy shift,” said Dr. Steven Sumner, resident in internal medicine at Duke University Hospital.

Without effective policies for handling employee illness, restaurants could have little choice but to allow a sick employee to work. It may be a long time before an optimal answer is developed; until then, load up on hand sanitizer.

MULTIMEDIA: UNC celebratory bonfire

MULTIMEDIA: UNC celebratory bonfire

17 Feb 2011, Posted by Michael Naclerio in News, 0 Comments


Check out Katie Contess and Chase Olivieri’s footage from the post-UNC game bonfire.

AdmissionSplash: A Facebook App to ease college admission anxieties

16 Feb 2011, Posted by Lauren Carroll in News, 1 Comments


I not-so-fondly remember this time last year when, like every other university-bound high school senior, my stomach constantly churned with anticipation and anxiety waiting for college decisions.

My friends and I rarely had a conversation that didn’t eventually become, “So do you think [insert name of selective university] will accept me? I mean, I think my SAT scores are high enough, and I really like my essay, but so-and-so is applying there, and she has a perfect score and more volunteer hours than me.”

As if these conversations weren’t obnoxious enough, now there’s an app for that!

admission splash screenshotThe new Facebook application, AdmissionSplash, launched last week. Students pick their colleges and fill out a questionnaire about their test scores, extracurricular activities, GPA and other related material. Then the application calculates the students’ chances are of getting into each school – fair, good or great.

AdmissionSplash, which was created by two students at George Washington University, was tested – with fairly positive results – on 75 students admitted to New York University and the University of California Los Angeles. Between 90 and 97 percent of the decisions were accurately predicted.

Just for fun, I tried it out.

I picked Duke as my college, filled in my fairly decent test scores and high school GPA, checked yes, I volunteered in high school, and no, I don’t think I have any chance of getting recruited for sports. At the end, AdmissionSplash told me that my chances for acceptance at Duke University were only fair, and the accompanying yellow emoticon seemed to say, “Be careful.”

The questionnaire, however, never asked me what my application essay was about, if I had good letters of recommendation or even if I held any leadership positions in high school, which is contrary to the way applications are read here at Duke.

In March 2010, Chronicle reporter Jessica Lichter wrote an in depth series about the admissions detailing the process of getting in. She wrote:

“But reading applications is not an entirely qualitative process. Both readers assigned to an application rate an applicant on a five-point scale in each of six categories: curriculum, achievement, letters of recommendation, extracurricular activities and personal qualities, essay and standardized testing.”

I hope that if this application gains popularity, that high schoolers don’t invest too much emotion into the results because, cliché as this may sound, you can never really predict what that decision letter is going to say.

This week in Chronicle history: February 1933

16 Feb 2011, Posted by Caitlin Johnson in Chronicle History, News, 0 Comments


It is 1933 and the nation is in the midst of the Great Depression, but you wouldn’t know it from reading The Chronicle’s archives from that year.

The Chronicle from the week of Feb. 8, since the paper wouldn’t begin to publish daily until 1968, has a spattering of articles on dances, lectures and student policies. This issue, like others I read over in the archive, is a testament to the existence of the Duke bubble. If a campus newspaper is supposed to be a microcosm of the University, then Duke was (and to a lesser extent remains) a very sheltered place.

In this issue, the big news is the approach of a series of highly anticipated dances. An image of the women from the Pan-Hellenic Council who would lead the dancing with their partners dominates the front page, and an article on the decorating scheme, “Women’s Gymnasium Is Regally Decorated For Valentine Dances,” is included beside it.

“Friday night will find the campus deep in preparation for the first dance of the long awaited Post-Examination series. . . . One of the most interesting features of these dances will be the decorations. On entering the gymnasium the dancer’s attention will immediately be focused upon a large red heart set on an appropriate background at the far end of the hall. This valentine sentiment is carried as the decorative scheme.”

1933 Dance Sponsors

Another front page article, this one below the fold, includes an overview of regulations the Social Standards committee had agreed upon for the dance. Among those cited in the article were requests that boys refrain from sending girls corsages. Rather humorously, they also requested that people respect the ambiance.

“The committee wishes to make a special plea to everyone not to tear up the decorations. They feel that after they have gone to so much trouble to put the decorations up, everyone ought to be allowed to enjoy them for the whole evening.”

Other topics that received substantial coverage in this issue, much like in the current Chronicle, are student and faculty group meetings and visits from important lecturers. An article titled “Faculty Makes Important Rule At Recent Meet,” describes the creation of the Dean’s List and a new policy that would allow students who make the list to be exempt from the current school wide attendance policy.

“A resolution allowing certain students of the two upper classes in the undergraduate school here to be free from the general university regulations concerning class attendance was passed at a recent meeting of the Duke faculty. . . . ‘Students whose names are on the dean’s list will not be subject to the general regulations of the university governing class attendance.’”

A note from the editors from that same week titled “The Dean’s List” applauds the University for the implementation of this new policy.

“The establishing of a Dean’s list for the present semester marks another step in the development of Trinity college. . . . No longer will the superior student be required either to be present at all sessions of his classes, or to submit some satisfactory excuse for his absences from them. He will be his own judge. He is now being recognized as a man capable of judgment.”

Chesterfield Ad

Cigarette advertisements frequented the pages of the 1933 Chronicle issues.

This issue, like others in the 1933 archives, was very Duke-centric to the point of containing no article on events outside the University, and very few references to the plight of the less fortunate around the country. It seems to me that important information is missing from this Chronicle’s folds. However, perhaps the Chronicle’s function in the 1930’s was not to inform students on a broad base of issues that impacted their lives at school and beyond the ivory tower, but rather as simply the definitive source of campus life.

Today many students look to the Chronicle for all their news consumption; in 1933, the Chronicle seemed to function more like a supplement to newspapers that address non-Duke issues. Back in 1933, if I picked up a Chronicle, I was searching specifically for information on student social and academic pursuits. Simply put: since its origins, The Chronicle has undergone a niche change.

Things you might not have know about The Chronicle in 1933

  1. The Chronicle sold for 10 cents and was published each Wednesday during the school year.
  2. Until 1972 Duke’s West Campus was home to the men’s college, and East Campus was the Women’s College of Duke. In this issue, the listing of editors and contributors to The Chronicle reflects this gender divide— men are simply editors and staffers, whereas women were specifically noted as co-ed editors and co-ed staff. Letters from the Editors are also gender specific; “co-ed editorial” marks the beginning of anything written by female editors.

Pop culture grid: Feaver & Munger

15 Feb 2011, Posted by Christina Pena in News, Pop Culture Grid, 1 Comments


What celebrity does Michael Munger, Earl D. McLean professor of political science, think would play him on the big screen?  What is the oddest thing Peter Feaver, Alexander F. Hehmeyer professor of political science, has eater? Find out now. Chronicle blogger Ziwen Deng caught up with these two political science professors you may recognize.

Graphic created by Christina Peña

Pop Culture Grid: Feaver & Munger