http://bigblog.dukechronicle.com/wp-content/themes/press

DevilSecurity

28 Oct 2011, Posted by Raisa Chowdhury in News, 0 Comments


Brittany Zulkiewicz/The Chronicle

Passwords are alarmingly vulnerable.

Senior editor of The Atlantic magazine and website, Ta-Nehisi Coates, gives a few pointers on password security in  his articleThe Art of the Password.

When freshman Sania Rahim opened up her iTunes account over Fall break, she noticed that there was a $50 purchase on her account that she hadn’t made.

“It was such a wake up call for me because I realized that someone could have made a more substantial purchase,” said Rahim. “I’m a very private person, so I feel uncomfortable with all these people having access to all my information.”

Coates suggests using a long, familiar sequence of words with spaces. Hackers’ computers cannot tell spaces from characters and have a harder time decoding these types of passwords.

If a long password is too much trouble, Coates gives the use of non-English words in a shorter sequence of words as an alternative. These are hard to guess and using numbers of characters adds another level of protection.

Gibberish passwords like “V*!amYEg5M5!3R”  can be generated by programs like LastPass but these can be hard to remember.

It’s important to store these somewhere secure, Coates emphasizes. A piece of paper in a wallet is usually sufficient, but online managers like LastPass and RoboFarm are safer. These corporations store parts of the encoding information in different places so if the main sites were ever compromised, a hacker wouldn’t have access to all the information that clients give them to keep safe.

John Smith, Office of Information Technology analyst, said that password security is not that big of an issue at Duke.

“We’ve gotten several requests about passwords but it’s not too often,” Smith said. “Maybe once every two weeks.”

Smith explained that this is because the password requirements for official Duke accounts are very stringent. Passwords must be at least seven characters long, cannot contain a dictionary word and must contain the uppercase and lowercase and either a number or special character.

For added safety, Coates recommends using different passwords for different things. However, having too many passwords can be hard to manage.

After her iTunes account became compromised, Rahim changed the way she operates online.

“I guess this is stupid, but I used the same password for everything before,” Rahim said. “Now I have different passwords for everything and I have to keep track of all my passwords.”

As a way to simplify this, Coates said, “The guide should be: any site that matters needs its own password—one you don’t currently use for any other site, and that you have never used anywhere else.”

Rahim has figured out another way to cut down on the number of logins she has. An online shopper, she has stopped creating accounts that store her credit card information. Instead, she makes purchases through guest accounts if they are available.

She said that she is also very conservative in what she shares on social media and has a lot of privacy settings set on her Facebook account.

Despite her cautions, Rahim pointed out, “People can save photos and share links if they want. Internet security is pretty much nonexistent.”

Durham’s home for the Paranormal

27 Oct 2011, Posted by Molly Himmelstein and Samantha Brooks in News, 0 Comments


The Rhine Research Center, just minutes from Duke’s campus, is a hub for parapsychology research, including telepathy and ESP. Until the 1960s, the research center was associated with Duke University. Now independent, the center still attracts a number of Duke graduates and professors in its work. Watch this video by The Chronicle’s Molly Himmelstein and Samantha Brooks.

Soundoff: Occupy Duke

27 Oct 2011, Posted by Andrew Karim in News, 0 Comments


Melisso Yeo/The Chronicle

Beginning with an information session at Duke Oct. 12, students have begun to rally to express solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement that began in early September. Occupy Duke has pitched tents in what they call an indefinite occupation of the quad in front of the Chapel in a movement to address the wealth inequality prevalent in America. The Chronicle’s Andrew Karim spoke with Duke students and faculty alike about their opinions on this issue. 

“I think the public demonstration of Occupy has value to the democratic principles the United States perpetrates, however I find that Duke students have some amazing opportunities that the ’99 percent’ would like to have. I think that we should be having discussions about the movement, however I find that the demonstration here and its small crowd doesn’t speak to the cause.”
—Cameron Kim, sophomore

“Occupy Duke hopes to foster critical discussion about serious issues affecting all members of society—issues that include egregious inequality of income, and corporate influence in the democratic process. We are trying to create an open, democratic space where students can express their concerns and ideas, knowing that their views are respected and given equal weight, and in doing so present an alternative to a process that privileges the powerful at the expense of the majority. As Duke students we need to recognize our complicity in the system that produces injustice and inequality and that erodes democracy, and start thinking of ways to change our attitudes and develop real solutions.”
—Casey Williams, sophomore

“I think Occupy Duke is an awesome opportunity to work toward the change everyone nationwide is calling for. We’re the kind of kids who will one day be writing policy and running companies, and I think Occupy could encourage us to do that responsibly and fairly.”
—Clare Fisher, freshman

“Occupy Duke’s rhetoric is infantile, its aims are vague and misplaced, and its paltry attendance does more to discredit it than any news source.”
—Josh Stillman, senior

“Even though they don’t have an agenda, I admire their efforts to create a dialogue on campus about these issues.”
—Jordan Fraser, sophomore

“While I was upset Occupy Duke didn’t join in solidarity with Occupy Durham to tackle those issues affecting the larger community, I am impressed with how they’ve crafted their messages and how approachable they’ve been. Hopefully they can begin to foster dialogue outside of their campsite as well.”
—Ibrahim Maali, senior

“Durham should occupy Duke, not its students.”
–Denver Dunn, senior

“Walking by Occupy Duke a few days ago was the first time I’ve heard a serious conversation about meritocracy between strangers who disagree at Duke. I’m of the sentiment that this conversation just doesn’t happen unless you get in people’s faces”
—Ian Harwood, junior

“I think the Occupy movement has an important place at Duke, a private institution with students from a variety of backgrounds. I would encourage students, especially those who decry the Occupy movement as nothing more than esoteric inaction, to stop by the encampment and engage in some constructive dialogue. I feel that this is what the Occupy movement is about – less short-term action that does not get at structural problems, and creating time and space for critical reflection, and for us to really figure out how we relate to one another and what would work for all of us, not just the 99 or 1 percent.”
—Ming Jiu Li, junior

“I am not against the general sentiment of the movement as a whole, but it’s curious that a consistent amount of the Duke Occupiers are students on full-ride scholarships. It’s easy to complain about the woes of the world when they don’t actually affect you, or not to worry about the ephemeral outcome of the occupation when you know that your privileged status will remain unscathed. They need to acknowledge that the system they’re protesting against actually works very much in their favor. Frankly, I consider them to be part of the ‘wealthy’ graced by the ‘benefits’ that the Occupy movement is questioning.”
—Chelsea Pieroni, sophomore

“The Bassett Affair, a 1903 controversy at Trinity College (later to become Duke University), has been referred to as “a milestone for academic freedom in U.S. higher education,” as it preserved the rights of faculty to freely express their opinions, even unfavorable ones. Since that time, Duke has consistently defended the right of every member of this University community to freely express his or her opinions and thoughts. So, whether or not one agrees with the purpose or principles of Occupy Duke, we should all be pleased and proud that our University supports everyone’s right to have a voice and to share it.”
—Dean Sue Wasiolek, assistant vice president for student affairs and dean of students

“Many of America’s social change movements were born on colleges and universities and much progress with civil rights, gay rights, women’s rights and more has been achieved through peaceful and thoughtful acts of conscience on our campuses. We may look back one day and attribute key changes to the ‘Occupy’ movements and to Occupy Duke as one exemplar of members of the Duke community standing up for what they believe. I do hope reasoned and reasonable discourse is enabled by the presence of Occupy Duke.”
—Larry Moneta, vice president of student affairs

“I’m glad to see Occupy Duke. I know many people are critical that the Occupy Together movement doesn’t have clear demands and proposals, but I think that bearing witness to the fact that the system just isn’t working in really basic ways for many people is worthwhile in itself.”
—Dr. Ruth Grant, professor of political science and philosophy, senior fellow at the Kenan Institute for Ethics

“Doing this is a way to make a world you want to live in, to start being where you want that world to be, and to find the people you want to know for this different living.”
—Wahneema Lubiano, associate professor of African and African-American studies

“At Occupy Duke, we have many questions, and we might not have all the answers and we’re not discouraged by that rather empowered by our collective strive for education and social change. The foremost goal of Occupy Duke is to create an open democratic space where anyone is free to critically and intellectually engage with the challenge of understanding systematic issues that we face today and injustices that unfortunately come along.”
—Anastasia Karklina, sophomore

LGBTQ history preserved in Durham library

26 Oct 2011, Posted by Caitlin Moyles in News, 0 Comments


Coming Out Day: Courtney Douglas/Chronicle File Photo

The Durham Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual and Questioning story has been preserved in Durham County Library in the form of historic repertoire.

Local residents brought posters, photographs and stories related to Durham’s LGBTQ history to the Durham County Library Saturday Oct. 22. At the event, librarians scanned photographs and recorded specific memories that people wanted to share in order to incorporate Durham’s LGBTQ history into the North Carolina Collection—its collection devoted to Durham’s history.

The collection, housed in the library’s main building on Roxboro Street, includes photographs, books and newspapers on topics ranging from the Tobacco Road and the civil rights movement to the arts. Although Durham hosted the first North Carolina Pride Parade in 1981 and is typically seen as a friendly, welcoming community for gays and lesbians, the library does not have a collection related to gay activism in Durham, said Lynn Richardson, local history librarian at Durham County Library who organized the event.

“We’ve got an LGBTQ community that’s been active for a long time, not only advocating its own civil rights but also making other contributions to the community such as owning businesses and being active politically,” Richardson said. “I want to make sure we document their history.”

Although the event did not draw “herds of people,” the library did receive a collection related to lesbian-owned businesses in Durham and some posters and photographs from several Pride Parades in the 1980s, Richardson said. She added that she recorded memories that four sources shared orally, which she hopes to transcribe and eventually post online. Several other volunteers had so many memories to share that Richardson made appointments to record and transcribe their oral histories at a later date, she added.

Richardson got the idea for the project when Durham County Library hosted a panel discussion about the 1981 pride march and Durham’s gay rights pioneers as part of its Commemorating Courage series last year, she said. The discussion drew approximately 100 people and felt like a “reunion” of activists who knew each other from the 1980s. Following the conversation, local activist Luke Hirst approached her and suggested the library start gathering and preserving LGBTQ documents and stories.

The fact that the pride marches of the 1980s are slipping further into the past added to the impetus to start the project, said Joanne Abel, humanities and adult programming coordinator at Durham County Library.

“A lot of people who were involved in the 1970s are getting old! We’re trying to save this stuff before people forget,” she said.

Although the event drew a small crowd, some of the people who did come in gave leads to new sources, which Richardson plans on contacting individually, Richardson said.

The library has put their collections on display in the past—for example, there was a display about the 1981 pride march in conjunction with the Commemorating Courage series—but the primary purpose of the North Carolina Collection is so the public can come to the library to do research about Durham’s history, Abel said.

Richardson emphasized the importance of the North Carolina Collection to Durham as a whole, and that it captures the full breadth and depth of Durham’s history, including LGBTQ activism.

“[The collection] is the one entity in the world whose main purpose is to preserve the history of Durham, and it’s located in the heart of downtown,” she said. “We want to preserve the depth of Durham’s history and make that accessible to the public.”

This week in Chronicle history

26 Oct 2011, Posted by Margot Tuchler in Backpages, Chronicle History, 0 Comments


Special to The Chronicle

Today, the most actively discussed issue of equality is LGBT rights. 50 years ago this week, however, our campus and our country were struggling with an issue that, thankfully, does not exist to the same extent today—anti-black racism.

The Chronicle wrote about this problem on Oct. 31, 1961 in an article called “Duke University Freshman, Negro See Alleged Assaulter Freed.”

It described the acquittal of white Durham resident Frederick Jones after he was charged with assault and battery for spitting in the face of an African American picketer, Burnice Toomer, and then charging at Duke student Donald Williams who took a picture of him being arrested. The article reports that in the incident, Jones also smashed Willams’s camera to the ground.

Both the article and the incident reported reflect a very different society than the one in which we currently live. First of all, the use of the word “Negro,” though used completely innocently and within conformity with the era, is immediately noticeable and slightly off-putting from a modern perspective, given that its use has nearly died out  due to connotations of bigotry.

And then, the article tells the tale of a judicial system that failed to convict a man who very obviously assaulted another. It seems fair to assume that today, such a breach in justice would not conceivably take place. Much has changed for the better for black Americans, but the same cannot be said for all minorities.

This 1961 article in The Chronicle is disconcerting—it’s uncomfortable to remember a time when this inequality was so glaringly obvious. It’s even more uncomfortable, though, to realize that today, members of a different minority are all too frequently being bullied, harassed and driven to suicide. Members of the LGBT community are not put at such a disadvantage in the legal system the way Burnice Toomis was, but still they are denied rights that other citizens have.

Mush has improved in the past fifty years, but sometimes it’s important to remember that there is still progress to be made.