http://bigblog.dukechronicle.com/wp-content/themes/press

Thoughts on the inauguration

20 Jan 2009, Posted by John Schneider in Backpages, Backtalk, 0 Comments


A strange feeling came over me as I watched the inauguration this afternoon: a weird sense of being pleased by the outcome of a political event. As modern college students, we are contractually obliged to be cynical and jaded, detached and ironic. But for a small gap of time I didn’t feel any of that. It didn’t really have anything to do anything President Barack Obama said (not that his speech wasn’t good, just that it was what we’ve come to expect from him). It was the sense of actually having respect for a political leader, of being kind of (as pathetic as this sounds) in awe of someone I was “supposed” to be in awe of.

Yesterday I had a similar feeling of happiness, except then it was closer to relief. When a news anchor announced that it was “officially [George W.] Bush’s last day as president” an unconscious smile crossed my face. And it’s not just that I agree with Obama more than I agree with Bush—Bush’s failure transcends policy issues. The Bush Administration was (isn’t that use of the past tense great?) such a failure not just because of what he did but because of what he represented—the glorification of idiocy, the perpetuation of dynastic elections, the entrenchment of a political class, the triumph of “folksy” charm over real intelligence, the elevation of religion and the suspension of the rational, the belief in dogma over practice, etc. Even during the last two months, while we were just waiting for this day, Bush was lingering in the background. Bush and Obama seemed like the co-heads of a dysfunctional country—one so discredited as to be completely incompetent and the other facing absurdly high expectations but with no real authority other than the ability to nominate his cabinet.

Now that Bush is officially gone, I am faced with the weird dilemma of being a cynic who actually respects an elected official. Granted, Obama hasn’t done anything yet. And I still don’t endorse or respect the current political system. In two months from now, maybe Obama will have royally screwed up and I may regret writing this. But right now it feels good to have a president who speaks eloquently and can actually convince me that he knows the meaning of the words he says, whose actions don’t all seem coldly calculated (even if a lot of them are), who is from an urban area and admits so frankly, who is proud of having an educated background, who plays basketball and gives fist-pounds to his wife. Yes, it’s style over substance, but so was John F. Kennedy, and everyone still loves him, right? And let’s be honest, the president’s main role is a symbolic one.

Ted Kennedy’s seizure, then, seems almost as poetic as it is sad. The senescence of the last fraternal link to John F.  Kennedy right after Obama was sworn in seems too heavy-handed to be real. Obama is filling a growing vacuum of public figures untouched by cynicism and disenchantment. It won’t last long, but I’m enjoying it right now.

I still don’t think you should have voted for him, though.

Hollywood Hokies

20 Jan 2009, Posted by Braden Hendricks in Backpages, Braden Hendricks, 0 Comments


(braden hendricks)A lot of people probably say to themselves: “boy, I wish I was a celebrity!” I guess I do that too, but I think I keep myself grounded more than most—I allow myself only 8 to 10 daydreams a day, as opposed to the norm of 12 to 15.  It’s nothing to be ashamed at, really, because everyone daydreams, but I concluded a few minutes ago that it is not only useless to fantasize about stardom, it should be downright reprehensible.

See, to be a celebrity is to be a phony, right? A fake.  A typical celebrity lives a life of facade to the public, regularly committing acts of deviousness and duplicity.  Heck, sometimes they push the limits of humanity, physically and morally. Why should we, the lowly plebians of society, aspire to be like them?

It’s a question that never occurred to me while I was safely removed from celebrities, but now that I’m in Los Angeles, it occupies my mind relentlessly. Why are we trained by society from childhood to worship these people who are elevated by virtue of their perfect bodies, acting ability or talent for putting a ball through a net? Excepting Dr. Phil, you don’t see a scientist getting that kind of attention. What gives?

Oh, that’s right, I forgot. Money gives.

Yes, it’s true, it all comes down to the money—comes down to it every time. Well, given the economy these days I can respect that, but you know what I can’t respect? Celebrities who pretend it’s about something other than the Benjamins. Celebrities are guilty of this all the time.  Angelina Jolie and Sarah McLachlan, for instance, are repeat offenders:

Adopting needy children? Please.

Adopting needy children? Please.

There's too many dogs already, Sarah.

There's too many dogs already, Sarah.

It’s an epidemic in Hollywood. What it really amounts to is a campaign by celebrities to make themselves feel better about driving their Ferraris to and from their mansions, and other such excesses. (On a side note, I have nothing but respect for the multitude of rappers who are very honest about what it is they’re about.)

If that were not enough, celebrities even have the gall to interfere in politics, something already dutifully noted by The Chronicle. The result of all these maneuvers is to create the semblance  of respectability to the average American. Well, I’m here to declare that I’m not fooled. I’m calling it like I see it, and I see irresponsible celebrities everywhere consuming the lives and energy of the many Americans following their every movement. I say enough is enough! The power of the celebrity derives from the attention we feed it. If you think the status of celebrities is bloated in this nation, then make like me and tune them out.  Don’t, however, do this.

Dispatches from a Chinese class

19 Jan 2009, Posted by Danny Lewin in Backpages, Backtalk, 0 Comments


There’s no room for subtlety in foreign language education. If instructors delved into the nuances of actual discussion and debate, they’d fall short of the goal of effectively conveying the vocabulary and grammatical structures. The end result is classes filled with sentences that, as they increase in grammatical and syntactic difficulty, commensurately increase in simplicity of subject. In short, because saying “The gendering of labor in the modern era is a complex issue” is a poor mechanism for conveying a grammatical structure, you’re much more likely to hear “Men are stronger than women, therefore they make more money.”

Thus, grammar review sessions in my Chinese class provide some pretty ridiculous quotes. I recorded some of them today for your reading pleasure.

“Everyone has reasons to be proud. Homeless people are no exception”

“You cannot kiss other girls in front of your girlfriend’s face”

“In Beijing, the dumplings taste good. As for the traffic, it is very congested”

“People who are fluent in 3 languages not only aren’t rare, but rather are very common”

“Giving lazy people money not only doesn’t help them, but rather makes them not want to work.”

“My university’s demand of me is that I pay a lot of money.”

“America’s legal system is effective against the president.”

“The president has a girlfriend. His wife knows. She’s dying to scold him.”

“Even though your wallet was stolen, you can’t really want to be homeless now.”

Becoming the dream

16 Jan 2009, Posted by Ade Sawyer in Ade Sawyer, Backpages, 2 Comments


(ade sawyer)On Aug. 28, 1963, my grandmother was there. She stood on the National Mall in front of the Lincoln Memorial when Martin Luther King Jr. articulated his dream for America. After making the long trek from Savannah, Ga., she stood with about 300,000 others to demand jobs and freedom. But, more importantly, she stood there to move America a step closer to the dream that she, King and millions across the country shared: an America that lived out the true meaning of its creed.

In the next week, as we commemorate King’s life, we will ask ourselves, “What becomes of the dream?” It is this question that will frame the week’s discussions. At the same time, we’ll witness and celebrate the inauguration of Barack Obama, our first black president. A man who benefited from the opportunities that the civil rights generation fought for and many died for. It’s tempting to see Obama’s election as the fulfillment of the dream, but many people have pointed out that America’s struggles with race are far from over. I think there’s really more to it than that.

One has to admit that Obama’s presidency is—to some degree—the fulfillment of King’s dream. But King’s dream was bigger than himself because it was shared by millions across the country. Likewise, Obama’s election is bigger than he is. It is, in fact, shared by each of us. I believe we—each of us—are the fulfillment of our ancestors’ and predecessors’ dreams. We are the citizens of the new America that elected Obama as its president.

More importantly, though, we are the products of the dreams our grandparents worked to realize. Because of them, we are able to live as well as we do. This is a thought I keep with me when life at Duke gets difficult, as it inevitably does. I remember that my ancestors worked as slaves and sharecroppers under the Georgia sun with the dream of a better life for me, that my grandfather worked in the civil rights movement in Savannah even after waking up one morning to threats from the Klan at his front door. Because of them, today, I live a life where my greatest hardship is having too much to read and write.

For other Duke students, the story is different. Some of our ancestors immigrated to America with nothing and worked to build a life here. Perhaps they toiled for years in their home countries to scrape together enough money to travel here and create a better life for their children. Some walked the Trail of Tears and pieced together an existence after everything had been taken from them. Some worked in America’s factories to support their families, and many, no doubt, went to war on this country’s behalf. I like to think that they were all propelled by a dream that culminated in our lives today.

This gives us the imperative to not only live up to the spirit of the dream, but to become dreamers ourselves. If our lives are built on generations of dreamers then I think it’s our responsibility to dream on behalf of future generations. And certainly there are many dreams to be had: an America that does more to spread opportunity to the poor and underprivileged; an end to the drug wars in Central and South America; peace in the Middle East; the resolution of widespread hunger, disease and violence in Africa; an end to terrorism of all kinds…. We can dream of whatever we choose, and work toward fulfilling those dreams for our children and their children.

I believe that we are “what becomes of the dream.” Tomorrow’s dreams will be our own.

The pledge piper

15 Jan 2009, Posted by Vijai Atal in Backpages, Cartoon, 0 Comments


Jan. 14, 2009

Jan. 14, 2009