http://bigblog.dukechronicle.com/wp-content/themes/press

3 things shockingly more important than the lady who played Kate on Lost

10 Feb 2011, Posted by Jason Liu in Backpages, 1 Comments


Personally, I always viewed myself as someone with generally normal views. Spending almost four years here in the Duke community has allowed me to encounter people with interesting perspectives that contrast greatly from mine. Though I reveled in learning and understanding other viewpoints, little did I know, that maybe I was the one with the abnormal views this whole time. My journey through Wikipedia has let me see that I am probably way out of the consensus of not just Duke but the world.

With Wikipedia, I found that the best way to see how important something is to society in general is to see how long the page for it. Longer Wikipedia entries indicate that most likely, more sources about the subject will be cited, indicating a larger general interest in said subject. Since Wikipedia is volunteer edited and submitted, long entries are easily prone to vandalism and such. Because of that, seeing the lack of errors and pranks in long entries is also a sign of importance because that means more volunteers are willing to make sure that the proper information goes out.

With that in mind, I decided to do some exploring in Wikipedia to learn about what the world considers more important than Evangeline Lilly, who played Kate on Lost. Lost if you did not know, is quite possibly the greatest show ever. So playing one of the most important characters on Lost has got to mean something right? Instead, I find a few surprises about how off my views were as compared to the world’s.

1. The fat acceptance movement: With obesity and heart disease rapidly increasing with no end in sight in this country, I thought people were in general pretty OK with expanding waistbands. We seem more likely to judge someone as too skinny these days anyways (Nicole Richie anyone?). Plus, the character Hurley on Lost was a definite fan favorite. One of the most entertaining characters on Glee is fat. I honestly would not have guessed that fat acceptance needed a movement, let alone a Wikipedia page, especially when all signs point to society already being reasonably accepting of body size differences.

2. Carlos Mencia: This comedian is more famous for sucking and ripping others off than for actually making people laugh. Considering how lame he is, how does he get a Wikipedia page longer than an actress who starred on a show with a large and zealous fan base? She even got positive reviews for her acting. The sky must be falling; Hell must be freezing over. Basic cable must be getting worse than it already is.

3. Ivan van Sertima: Most people do not even know or care who this person is. Courtesy of the random article link on Wikipedia, I discovered he is basically some hack proponent of pseudo-history who ended up teaching at Rutgers and even once testifying for a congressional hearing. One would describe him as a very good example of academia gone wrong. Evangeline Lilly knew that she was playing a fictional character when signed on for Lost. I would figure that people involved at Rutgers would have done their best to hide his Wikipedia page so that no one would know how embarrassing he was to the school.

Jason Liu is a Pratt senior. His online column will run every Thursday.

I am not ignorant, but I do sleep well

03 Feb 2011, Posted by Jason Liu in Backpages, 2 Comments


Most of the time, the majority of tables on the Plaza revolve around some sort of free merchandise, free food, or club promotion. Those tables are usually quite easy to walk right past. However, sometimes walking through the Plaza morphs into an obstacle course I like to call the “Gauntlet of Guilt.”  This “gauntlet” only exists when the number of tables led by the self-righteous with “cause awareness” as their goal reaches a critical mass. At that point, ignoring tables means ignoring injustices. Fortunately for me, I am immune to their powers of persuasion and can walk on to class without a flinch.

Part of my resistance comes from the fact that the self-righteous crowd quite honestly is not being self-righteous enough. I have seen tables talking about problems of questionable scientific veracity like man-made global warming. I have seen tables mentioning problems of questionable significance such as how my meat is being killed (seriously, as long as it is sanitary). However, I have never seen tables dedicated to the coltan problem. Coltan is the key mineral used in capacitors, which are essential for all electronics. Let me explain: If diamonds could earn a Leonardo DiCaprio movie, then coltan needs a trilogy of movies in which Leonardo DiCaprio will be lucky just to have a part. People in Africa are dying so that we can check our e-mail, watch the Super Bowl, spam text our friends, and play Call of Duty at an absurdly affordable price.

That then leads me to the conclusion that pretty much anyone using an electronic device to aid them in soliciting donations is failing the righteousness test. They actually seem quite ignorant. Think about all of those tables on the Plaza that have some sort of electronic device to help them aid in their cause, ranging from a computer to sign up for a listserv or a Flex reader. That means by helping Darfur or curing cancer, I am also helping fund more violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

This does not have to be limited to just the coltan problem. Every sort of cause has someone who ignored something more important. For example, I noticed very few boycotts of the 2010 World Cup, considering the South Africa’s history of violence after apartheid ended. Haiti was already one of the poorest countries on Earth before the devastating earthquake, and I continually wonder why so little effort was spent trying to solicit donations from me in the past.

Thus, I have given away my secret to how I ignore all those charities yet sleep well at night. I hope everyone who reads this finds a way to use my technique of making it through a “Gauntlet of Guilt” completely guilt-free.

However, I know that not everyone can go to sleep knowing about darker more severe problems, so I even propose to you a way to deal with that part. You should rationalize that since you have a better life with better opportunities, you will somehow find some way to parlay your situation to improve the rest of the world. Once you use that sort of logic, you have no reason other than to live long and prosper.

Jason Liu is a Pratt senior. His online column will run every Thursday.

  • Polls

    What is the best thing about the holidays?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...